I am currently taking a class called
“The Wired Society” and our textbook is Thomas Friedman’s book, “The World is
Flat.” It is a great read! He writes with a lot of style. Unfortunately, he is
forced to quote people whose speech patterns do not match his style. Friedman’s
prose is lively; it moves along at a good clip. When a quote comes along and
breaks it up, it’s noticeable. For example:
“This platform (what he calls ‘The
Machine’) for multiple forms of collaboration was indeed the start of something
very, very new and very,
very big.”
Very is not a descriptive word. It
falls into the category of intensifiers, along with words such as “really,
extremely, and severely.” In short, they fluff up our writing. They fill up the
page so we reach that dreaded word requirement.
The rest of
his book is riveting. He introduces new concepts with anecdotes and uses a lot
of repetition to illustrate his point. He also varies sentence length. And
sometimes he breaks some rules and throws a few sentence fragments in there.
They emphasize his point and add a conversational feel to the text. The truth
is, he writes with a unique style that has made an otherwise unbearable class
worthwhile.
I like your observation on intensifiers. After reading the chapter I actually started to hear how many people rely on intensifiers. Creative word choice is underrated. I've even noticed and actually stopped myself from subconsciously saying a lot of intensifiers this week.
ReplyDelete